A Tax-onomy of Transactions and the Road to Alpha (Part 1)

Beta and Alpha

Every business has a Beta. Few create Alpha.  The vocabulary is borrowed from investing, and the borrowing is exact. Beta is the return a fund earns simply by being exposed to the market — if the index rises 10% and the fund rises 10%, that is not skill, that is exposure. Alpha is the excess return generated above the market by insight, timing, or execution. Applied to a brand, Beta is the revenue the business would have done anyway — the trajectory it was already on, set by category growth, prior brand equity, distribution already in place, and standard execution. Alpha is the incremental revenue produced above that baseline. Nothing else counts.

In the Age of AI, Beta belongs to everyone. Every meaningful capability that once created edge is being commoditised by AI within a single cycle: content variants, segmentation, creative testing, agentic execution, personalisation at scale, campaign optimisation. ERP did this in the 1990s. Cloud did it in the 2000s. Mobile did it in the 2010s. AI is doing it faster and across a wider surface than any prior wave. Saying “we use AI” will signal nothing about competitive position by 2027 — the way “we use cloud” signals nothing now. What was once Alpha becomes Beta in months, not years. A brand running on standard agents and standard tools will earn Beta returns — never Alpha.

For B2C and D2C, Alpha can only come from marketing. Product can be copied within months. Pricing is constrained by competitors. Distribution is rented from a small number of platforms. Capital costs the same on both sides of the deal. Supply-chain advantages collapse as supplier networks become shared. The only remaining surface where a consumer brand can produce durable separation is the relationship with its customers — who pays attention to it, who buys repeatedly, who returns without being paid for. Everything else is Beta. In B2C, marketing is now the only place where Alpha is made.

Marketing Alpha comes from two levers: less Time and less Tax.

The mistake most brands make is to treat revenue as one undifferentiated number. It is not. The first lever — less Time — compresses the gap between transactions, so the same customer delivers more revenue in the same window. If the next transaction arrives through an owned route, LTV compounds; if it arrives through adtech after a lapse, the brand pays for a relationship it had already earned.

The second lever — less Tax — routes each transaction through a cheaper rung of the Revenue Tax ladder. Sometimes the tax is near zero — the customer returned on their own. Sometimes it is modest — CRM created the sale. Sometimes it is punishing because Google, Meta, Amazon, Flipkart, Blinkit or Zepto controlled the moment of purchase — 20–25% to adtech, 30–40%+ to a marketplace or quick-commerce platform.

Both levers must be measured above Beta, never against zero. Alpha begins when a brand stops asking “how much did we sell?” and starts asking “how much tax did we pay to sell it, and how long did it take to get the next transaction?”

Pay less tax per transaction. Reduce the time to the next transaction. Never pay twice.

Published by

Rajesh Jain

An Entrepreneur based in Mumbai, India.

Leave a Reply