Mint: “In 1848, Samuel Brannan struck it rich—not by mining gold, but by selling shovels. Today, India’s ‘market plumbing’ follows his blueprint. While investors chase the next big stock, the real fortune could lie somewhere else.”
Doug O’Laughlin: “Claude Code (and subsequent innovations) clearly will change a lot about software, but the typical (and right) pushback is that you cannot use “non-deterministic software” for defined business practices. However, there is a persistent design pattern in hardware that addresses this difference: the memory hierarchy. No one can rely on anything in a computer’s non-persistent memory, yet it is one of the most valuable components of the entire stack. For those unfamiliar with computer science, there is a memory hierarchy that trades capacity and persistence for speed, and the system works because there are handoffs between levels. In the traditional stack, SRAM sits at the top; overflow is to DRAM, which is non-persistent (if you turn it off, it goes away), and then to NAND, which is persistent (if you turn it off, it persists). I don’t think it’s worth matching the hierarchy too closely, but I believe that Claude Code and Agent Next will be the non-persistent memory stack in the compute stack. Claude Code is DRAM.”
Business Standard: “A decade into Startup India, most Indian unicorns are clustered in consumer and finance, highlighting limited depth in enterprise tech and frontier technologies like AI.”
NYTimes: “Luiz Pessoa, who runs the Maryland Neuroimaging Center, recently offered a metaphor that helps a layman like me understand what’s going on. In an essay for Aeon, he asks us to imagine a flock of starlings swooping and swirling in the sky. No single starling organizes this ballet, yet out of the local interactions between all the starlings a coordinated dance emerges. As the brain is trying to navigate through the complex situations of the day, it is creating what Pessoa calls “neuronal ensembles distributed across multiple brain regions,” which, like a murmuration of starlings, “forms a single pattern from the collective behavior.” This makes sense to me. Life is really complicated. To deal with a million unexpected circumstances, you wouldn’t want a brain filled with just a few regions doing just a few jobs. You’d want the brain to be able to improvise a vast number of networked ensembles that would dynamically affiliate and thus coordinate sensible responses.”