The following week, I was scheduled to do the same presentation at another marketing conference – this time in San Diego. My disastrous NY experience meant that I could not use the same title. I clearly needed something very different.
Looking back at what had gone wrong in New York, I realised the issue wasn’t just the delivery; it was about connecting with the audience at a more visceral level. The parallel session that had been taking place when I spoke on “Profitless to Profipoly: Re-engineering Retention with AI Twins and Email Apps” was titled “Your Post-Purchase Flow Is Terrible. Here’s Why.” I remember glancing at it and realising that it resonated more immediately. Taking a dispassionate view, it was clear which title seemed more attractive and likely to grab attention. Titles matter. They set expectations and draw people in before you’ve even had the chance to speak.
With this in mind, I decided to scrap my original title and take a new approach. My revised title? “Your Acquisition Strategy Sucks! 3 AI-Powered Fixes You Need Now.” There were five critical reasons why I settled on this title (with a little help from the AIs, of course).
First, I learned the hard way that you must start where the audience is, not where you want them to be. It’s a fundamental principle of communication, yet one I had overlooked in my eagerness to share my vision. Customer acquisition is the primary obsession of marketing teams, not retention. So, instead of leading with retention (which should come later), I led with acquisition. It’s always easier to hook people in with something they’re already anxious about. It’s like fishing – you bait the hook with what the fish wants, not what you think they should eat.
Second, the title needed to be bold and hard-hitting. “Your Acquisition Strategy Sucks” isn’t just a statement; it’s a challenge. It triggers a visceral reaction, which is exactly what’s needed to cut through the noise at a crowded conference. In a sea of polite, jargon-filled titles, this one promised to deliver some hard truths. It’s provocative, maybe even a bit uncomfortable, but that’s what creates engagement. In fact, a colleague overheard an attendee tell another at the lunch table, “This is a session I want to attend. Rising cost of acquisition is a serious problem in my company.” This anecdote perfectly illustrated the power of addressing a pain point head-on.
Third, while the first half grabs attention, the second half offers a solution. It’s not enough to point out the flaws; you must also promise a way out. That’s where “3 AI-Powered Fixes You Need Now” came in. It’s not just pointing out a problem; it’s promising specific, countable solutions. There’s something psychologically appealing about the number three – it’s manageable, memorable, and implies a comprehensive approach without being overwhelming.
Fourth, let’s face it – AI is the buzzword of the moment. If AI is in the title, you’ve already given your talk a major head start because it’s what everyone wants to hear about. AI is synonymous with modern, cutting-edge solutions, and anything less would seem dated. Everyone’s talking about AI, everyone’s curious about it, and everyone’s a bit anxious about being left behind. By prominently featuring AI, I’m signalling that this talk is cutting-edge, relevant, and potentially game-changing.
Finally, the title had to suggest immediate actionability. The promise of “3 AI-powered fixes you need now” creates a sense of urgency, implying that these aren’t just theoretical concepts or future possibilities, but solutions that can be implemented right away. In a world where marketers are constantly bombarded with new ideas and strategies, the promise of something they can act on immediately is incredibly appealing.
This new title was a complete departure from my original approach. It was less about educating and more about provoking. Less about my vision and more about their pain points. It was a calculated risk, but one that I hoped would fill the room and create the engagement I needed to eventually lead them to the ideas of retention re-engineering and the path to becoming a profipoly.
It worked. I had a full room. (The competition in this case was not another session, but the amazing weather and views right outside the conference room; it was San Diego after all.)
**
The experience with the two presentations became a valuable turning point. It has reignited my passion for the art of communication and reminded me of the ever-present need to connect with our audience on their terms, not just ours. As I move forward, I carry with me a renewed appreciation for the delicate balance between innovation and accessibility, between complexity and appeal. In the end, this lesson in humility may prove to be the most valuable presentation I could have given – to myself.
