NeoMarketing: Profit Engineering for Rule of 40 and CMO Comeback (Part 2)

North Star Metric

The North Star Metric for measuring the NeoMarketing transformation should be the Rule of 40—originally developed for SaaS but equally powerful for any business. The Rule of 40 states that a company’s combined revenue growth rate and profit margin should exceed 40%, creating a balanced framework that prevents the false choice between growth and profitability. I wrote in EAGLES: The Six Essential Metrics to Revolutionise eCommerce Profitability:

The Rule of 40 provides an elegant solution to the growth-versus-profitability dilemma that plagues many eCommerce businesses. By stipulating that a healthy business’s combined revenue growth rate and profit margin should exceed 40%, it creates a flexible framework that accommodates different strategic phases while maintaining fiscal discipline.

This metric acknowledges that companies may legitimately prioritise growth over immediate profitability, but not without limits. A business growing at 50% annually can run at a 10% loss and still meet the Rule of 40 standard, while a mature business growing at 15% should generate at least 25% profit margins.

What makes the Rule of 40 particularly valuable for eCommerce is its ability to counterbalance the industry’s frequent over-emphasis on growth at all costs. By incorporating this metric into regular reporting, businesses create a natural brake against unsustainable practices like excessive discounting, over-reliance on paid acquisition, or margin-eroding free shipping policies.

I asked Claude for an explainer on why the Rule of 40 is such a good metric for every company.

The Rule of 40, originally popularised in SaaS circles, offers a brilliantly elegant solution to one of business’s most persistent dilemmas: the false choice between growth and profitability. This metric—which requires that a company’s combined revenue growth rate and profit margin exceed 40%—provides a flexible framework that can transform how any company approaches systematic, sustainable growth.

Why Every Company Needs the Rule of 40

Prevents Growth-at-All-Costs Madness: The Rule of 40 creates a natural brake against unsustainable practices. A company growing at 50% annually can justify running at a 10% loss and still meet the standard, whilst a mature business growing at 15% should generate at least 25% profit margins. This balance prevents the common trap of celebrating growth that destroys long-term value.

Accommodates Different Strategic Phases: Unlike rigid profitability targets, the Rule of 40 recognises that businesses legitimately prioritise differently at various stages. High-growth startups can operate at lower margins whilst still demonstrating fiscal discipline, whilst mature companies must prove their efficiency through higher profitability when growth naturally slows.

Forces Strategic Discipline: Most businesses operate with separate growth and profitability initiatives that often work at cross-purposes. The Rule of 40 forces integration—every strategic decision must consider both growth and margin impact simultaneously, creating more coherent business strategies.

Real-World Application Beyond SaaS

For eCommerce companies, the Rule of 40 counterbalances the industry’s frequent over-emphasis on growth metrics like conversion rates and customer acquisition. It prevents margin-eroding practices such as excessive discounting, over-reliance on paid acquisition, or unsustainable free shipping policies.

For traditional retailers, it provides a framework for evaluating expansion decisions—new locations, product lines, or market entry strategies must contribute to the combined 40% threshold rather than just top-line growth.

For B2B service companies, it helps balance investment in new capabilities against operational efficiency, ensuring that expansion strengthens rather than dilutes the business model.

The Profit Engineering Connection

The Rule of 40 becomes particularly powerful when combined with systematic approaches to eliminate waste and maximise customer value. Companies achieving Rule of 40 performance typically focus on maximising revenue from existing customers whilst ruthlessly eliminating inefficient spending—precisely the approach that transforms marketing from a cost centre into a profit engine.

By adopting the Rule of 40 as a primary metric, companies create a balanced scorecard that ensures growth investments deliver sustainable returns whilst maintaining the operational discipline necessary for long-term success.

Thinks 1667

Arnold Kling: “No other species on earth combines strength in cooperation with strength in competition. If another species is high in cooperation, then it is low in competition. If it is high in competition, then it is low in cooperation. I believe that this combination of high cooperation and high competition is the key to understanding social psychology, and the human condition more generally. We cooperate in order to compete, and we compete in order to cooperate. We cooperate in order to compete by forming teams, creating roles, and building loyalty. We do this in sports, business, war, politics, and other realms.”

Cindy Anderson: Based on the survey responses, there are five ways that executives find value in thought leadership consumption: (1) It drives revenue growth and profitability: 46 percent of global C-suite executives said that thought leadership helped drive greater revenue growth in their organization (2) It gives executives a competitive advantage. Almost all (96 percent) of respondents said that having that kind of data and analysis helps them make better business decisions. (3) It improves innovation and business agility (4) Their employees are more satisfied (5) They have fewer knowledge gaps. Thought leadership helps them compensate for inadequate data and analysis within their own organizations.”

WaPo: “Over the past five years, Saylor has transformed his Tysons Corner datamining company, MicroStrategy, into what he calls a “bitcoin treasury.” The company issued stock and bonds to raise money, and with that, it bought billions of dollars worth of the cryptocurrency. When bitcoin prices rose with the presidential election last year of Donald Trump, a crypto fan, company shares tripled in value. The company’s profits, however, didn’t end there. In a feat of what seems like financial levitation, the company’s stock rose even faster than the price of bitcoin, and today the “bitcoin treasury” company is valued by investors at almost twice the value of its main asset, the bitcoin.”

SaaStr: “Unlike previous technology waves where knowledge could be protected through patents or trade secrets, AI advancement seems to follow a different pattern. The core insights about training large language models have become valuable precisely because they can’t be easily replicated or reverse-engineered…The war for AI talent isn’t just about building better products—it’s about access to a finite pool of people who understand how to make AI actually work in enterprise contexts.”

NeoMarketing: Profit Engineering for Rule of 40 and CMO Comeback (Part 1)

Overview

In my previous essay, I explored how NeoMarketing provides the systematic approach to achieving sustainable, profitable growth. Here is a summary of the key ideas.

NeoMarketing: Engineering Marketing’s Third Great Era

Marketing has reached its own “mission impossible” moment. Like breaking the sound barrier or landing on the Moon, achieving simultaneous growth and profitability has long seemed insurmountable. Traditional marketing forces an impossible choice: CMOs deliver growth, CFOs demand profits, and CEOs want both. Yet rising marketing spend continues to outpace revenue growth by 30-50%, whilst 70% of budgets disappear into reacquisition AdWaste—repeatedly paying premium prices to reach customers already in the database.

This structural failure isn’t merely a budgeting problem. It’s the inevitable result of marketing’s evolution through two distinct eras. Brand Marketing (1950s-1990s) built awareness through mass media but struggled with measurement. Performance Marketing (2000s-2020s) solved measurement through digital targeting but created platform dependency and the £500 billion AdWaste crisis.

NeoMarketing represents marketing’s third great era—a systematic approach to engineering profits, not just growth. Rather than optimising existing approaches, it inverts the fundamental assumptions that have governed marketing for two decades.

The Five Great Shifts

NeoMarketing transforms marketing through five critical transitions:

  • From Rented Reach to Owned Attention: End the 20-30% platform “revenue tax” by building direct customer relationships through websites, emails, apps, and WhatsApp rather than renting access through Google, Meta, and Amazon.
  • From Revenue Engineering to Profit Engineering: Replace growth-at-any-cost mentality with systematic margin improvement focused on lifetime value, repeat purchase rates, and Rule of 40 performance.
  • From Reacquisition Addiction to Retention Mastery: Shift from first-sale obsession to repeat-sale focus, halving AdWaste through loyalty programmes that systematically grow customer value over time.
  • From Anonymous Segments to Identified Individuals: Move beyond third-party cookies and demographic approximations to first-party data and N=1 personalisation that recognises each customer’s unique value potential.
  • From Fragmented Tools to AI-First Integration: Replace manual operations across disconnected martech stacks with AI agents powering autonomous systems that learn, adapt, and optimise continuously.

The 4 A’s: Breakthrough Technologies

Four innovations make NeoMarketing’s profit engineering possible today:

  • Agents: AI-powered multi-agent systems enable true 1:1 relationships at scale through the AI Agents Collective, making every customer feel unique without human overhead.
  • Agency: Progency reinvents the agency model with outcome-based pricing—earning only when measurable growth is delivered, aligning incentives for true profit partnership.
  • Attention: NeoMails solve the “No Hotline” problem by creating habit-forming engagement channels that transform the inbox into daily owned media.
  • Acquisition: NeoN creates the world’s first brand-to-brand cooperative ad network using authenticated identity targeting, allowing brands to simultaneously monetise their audiences and reach dormant customers at 30-50% lower costs.

**

NeoMarketing is the only path for systematic, sustainable, profitable growth, transforming marketing from cost centre to profit engine, delivering systematic profit margin improvements and Rule of 40 performance.

Thinks 1666

SaaStr: “In June 2025, Replit CEO Amjad Masad dropped a bombshell on X: his company had crossed $100M ARR, up from just $10M at the end of 2024. That’s 10x growth in less than 6 months—making Replit one of the fastest B2B scale stories in recent history. But here’s what makes this story truly remarkable: Replit didn’t just grow fast. It and other leaders in the space fundamentally changed what it means to build software, pioneering the “vibe coding” movement where anyone can create production apps using natural language. No (or relatively little) coding expertise required.  And allowing more experienced developer to ship far faster. This isn’t just another software success story. It’s the emergence of a new category that’s attracting billions in investment and fundamentally disrupting the $500B+ software development market.”

Amjad Masad: “In Silicon Valley, you hear a lot of talk about the 10x engineer Think of some of these A.I. researchers as 1,000x engineers. If you can add one person who can change the trajectory of your entire company, it’s worth it.”

Bloomberg: “For as long as most of us can remember, business has been able to call on a ready supply of foreign workers. The giants of Silicon Valley, farmers and food processors, hotels and restaurants, housebuilders and megastores: All have dealt with labor shortages by recruiting immigrants. One result has been an astonishing demographic transformation: 16% of the British population, 20% of the Swedish population, 19% of the German population and 14.3% of the US population were born abroad. This golden age for employers is coming to an end. Popular discontent with mass immigration is rising, anti-immigrant parties are flourishing and mainstream parties are finally taking note.”

Arnold Kling: “Sports gambling is an example of a predatory business model. The entire business is designed to find psychologically weak people and exploit them. Maybe 95 percent of sports gamblers do it for fun and don’t hurt themselves, but the point of the business is to capture the other 5 percent. Or so I believe. To really know whether sports gambling is predatory, I propose that either a government agency or a consumer organization conduct a business model audit for each firm in the industry. This would look at all of the business processes involved—product design, marketing, customer relations, etc. The goal would be to identify practices that either intentionally or unintentionally select for and take advantage of the customers who are least able to fend off exploitation.”

NeoMarketing: The ONLY Path to Systematic, Sustainable, Profitable Growth (Part 4)

4 A’s

The five transitions are not incremental upgrades—they represent a foundational rethinking of how marketing delivers value.

  • Old Marketing’s goal: Acquire more customers through volume and transactions.
  • NeoMarketing’s goal: Grow customer value through retention, engagement, and profitable relationships.

Customers are no longer targets to be captured—they are value partners to be cultivated.

The result transforms marketing’s role within the business. Rather than being the department that spends money to bring in revenue (cost centre model), marketing becomes the department that engineers profitable relationships that compound over time (profit centre model).

Why Now

What once seemed like marketing’s “mission impossible”—delivering both growth and profitability—is now within reach, thanks to four breakthrough innovations. Together, they form the “4 A’s” of NeoMarketing:

  • Agents: The rise of multi-agent systems enables true 1:1 relationships at scale. Through the AI Agents Collective, brands can orchestrate journeys, personalise messages, and optimise campaigns autonomously—making every customer feel like the only customer, without adding human overhead.
  • Agency: Progency reinvents the agency model. Instead of charging for time or media, it aligns incentives through outcome-based pricing—earning only when measurable growth is delivered. This shift from input to impact makes the agency a true partner in profit.
  • Attention: NeoMails solve the “No Hotline” problem by creating always-on, habit-forming engagement channels. Delivered via email but experienced like apps, they transform the inbox into a daily owned media asset—ending reliance on platforms and reclaiming attention.
  • Acquisition: NeoN creates the world’s first brand-to-brand cooperative ad network using authenticated identity targeting. Every participating brand simultaneously makes money as a publisher (monetising their engaged audiences) and saves money as an advertiser (reaching dormant customers at 30-50% lower costs than traditional platforms). This cooperative structure eliminates platform intermediaries whilst delivering precision targeting through deterministic PII matching.

For decades, marketing lacked the capabilities to engineer profits systematically. The data was fragmented. The tools were limited. The models were misaligned. But now—with AI-powered agents, performance-aligned agencies, owned attention channels, and cooperative acquisition networks—NeoMarketing transforms the impossible into the inevitable.

From Vision to Execution

NeoMarketing is not just a theory. It is a blueprint for marketing’s reinvention—anchored in first principles, powered by AI, and driven by outcomes. For leaders tired of choosing between growth and profitability, it offers a third path: systematic, sustainable, profitable growth that achieves Rule of 40 (revenue growth + profit margin) performance.

Every business now faces a fundamental choice: continue paying the platform tax whilst trapped in the growth-versus-profit paradox, or embrace the systematic profit engineering that NeoMarketing makes possible.

History shows us that when breakthrough thinking meets enabling technology, adoption follows one of two paths: lead the transformation and capture competitive advantage, or wait until the new paradigm becomes table stakes.

The challenge is not in recognising the need for change—it’s in committing to it. Whilst competitors remain trapped in AdWaste cycles, early adopters can engineer systematic profit improvements that compound over time. NeoMarketing isn’t just about better marketing—it’s about fundamentally superior business economics.

The tools are here. The opportunity is unprecedented. The moment is now.

The only question left is: will you be a bystander—or a pioneer of the new era?

Thinks 1665

Anthropic: “Multi-agent systems work mainly because they help spend enough tokens to solve the problem. In our analysis, three factors explained 95% of the performance variance in the BrowseComp evaluation (which tests the ability of browsing agents to locate hard-to-find information). We found that token usage by itself explains 80% of the variance, with the number of tool calls and the model choice as the two other explanatory factors. This finding validates our architecture that distributes work across agents with separate context windows to add more capacity for parallel reasoning. The latest Claude models act as large efficiency multipliers on token use, as upgrading to Claude Sonnet 4 is a larger performance gain than doubling the token budget on Claude Sonnet 3.7. Multi-agent architectures effectively scale token usage for tasks that exceed the limits of single agents.”

Bloomberg: “Nearly one in four Indians said in a survey they use only mobile phones to consume media content, as TVs stay unaffordable for many, prompting companies from Meta Platforms Inc. to Netflix Inc. to boost digital strategies in the world’s largest consumer market. The number of users who only use digital channels ballooned to 23% in the March quarter of 2025, according to market research firm Kantar’s Media Compass report this week, which surveyed 87,000 Indians across the country. That compares with 15% in the same period in 2023. The trend is skewed toward lower-income groups and rural users, especially men, said Puneet Avasthi, director of specialist businesses at Kantar’s Insights Division for South Asia. Many people who are now consuming digital content on mobile phones were “media dark,” he said, as television sets and multiple OTT subscriptions are costly.”

Vox: “Scientist AI won’t be like an AI agent — it’ll have no autonomy and no goals of its own. Instead, its main job will be to calculate the probability that some other AI’s action would cause harm — and, if the action is too risky, block it. AI companies could overlay Scientist AI onto their models to stop them from doing something dangerous, akin to how we put guardrails along highways to stop cars from veering off course.”

Ryan Roslansky: “The basic task of, “Hey, there’s a billion people on LinkedIn. I need to find someone like [them]” — it’s really good at that. Step two: “Reach out to this person to make sure that she’s actually in the market for a job or wants to have a conversation.” Historically, it’s not great at that. But that’s a pretty low-level task we’ve gotten really, really good at. “Talk to this person and convince them to come work at LinkedIn?” No way. A human being is still way better at that sales process. That’s where I think that the tools stop. I don’t know if they’ll ever really catch up.”

100 best movies of the 21st century, from NYTimes.

NeoMarketing: The ONLY Path to Systematic, Sustainable, Profitable Growth (Part 3)

Five Shifts

To fulfil its true promise as a driver of profitable growth, marketing must evolve beyond the outdated playbooks of the past. Old Marketing cannot deliver what today’s business realities demand.

The mission impossible we’ve described—delivering simultaneous growth and profitability—cannot be solved by optimising existing approaches. Just as supersonic flight wasn’t achieved by building stronger engines but by rethinking aerodynamics, marketing’s breakthrough won’t come from working harder—it will come from thinking differently.

This transformation isn’t about adopting new tools or tactics. It’s about inverting the fundamental assumptions that have governed marketing for two decades. It’s about shifting from a transaction-obsessed, platform-dependent model to a relationship-driven, profit-engineered system.

Marketing has already undergone two major evolutionary leaps. The First Era (1950s-1990s) was Brand Marketing—mass media campaigns that built awareness through creative storytelling but struggled with measurement and accountability. The Second Era (2000s-2020s) became Performance Marketing—digital platforms that solved measurement through data-driven targeting but created platform dependency and the $500 billion AdWaste crisis we face today.

Now begins NeoMarketing—marketing’s third great era.

Old Marketing vs. NeoMarketing: The Five Great Shifts

NeoMarketing achieves the transformation through five fundamental shifts that invert the assumptions underlying traditional (old) marketing.

  1. Rented Reach –> Owned Attention

Old Marketing: Pay 20-30% revenue tax for rented access through Google, Meta, Amazon, and other marketplaces. Every customer interaction generates platform profit before brand profit.

NeoMarketing: Own direct channels and customer relationships through websites, emails, apps, WhatsApp, and emerging owned media. Control the conversation, timing, and economics of every interaction and engagement.

Impact: End platform dependency, control acquisition costs, improve engagement rates, and reclaim the 20-30% revenue tax flowing to intermediaries.

  1. Revenue Engineering –> Profit Engineering

Old Marketing: Growth at any cost mentality driven by vanity metrics—impressions, clicks, reach, and top-line revenue regardless of underlying economics.

NeoMarketing: Systematic margin improvement through profit metrics—lifetime value, repeat purchase rates, contribution margins, and Rule of 40 performance.

Impact: Transform marketing from cost centre to profit engine, achieve sustainable growth that strengthens rather than weakens business fundamentals.

  1. Reacquisition Addiction –> Retention Mastery

Old Marketing: First-sale obsession with 70% of budgets trapped in reacquisition loops—repeatedly paying premium prices to reach customers already in the database.

NeoMarketing: Repeat-sale focus with loyalty and lifecycle programmes that systematically grow customer value over time rather than constantly replacing lost customers.

Impact: Halve AdWaste through retention excellence, double customer lifetime value through systematic relationship building.

  1. Anonymous Segments –> Identified Individuals

Old Marketing: Third-party cookies, probabilistic targeting, and generic demographic segments that treat customers as statistical approximations rather than unique individuals.

NeoMarketing: First-party data, deterministic matching, and N=1 personalisation that recognises each customer’s unique preferences, behaviours, and value potential.

Impact: True personalisation at scale, shift from broad segments to individual relationships, solve the “Not for Me” problem that drives attention recession.

  1. Fragmented Tools à AI-First Integration

Old Marketing: Manual operations across fragmented martech stacks requiring constant human intervention, complex integrations, and reactive campaign management.

NeoMarketing: AI agents powering integrated autonomous systems that learn, adapt, and optimise continuously without human bottlenecks or integration complexity.

Impact: Faster execution, lower cost per campaign, always-on optimisation, and systematic improvement rather than periodic campaign bursts.

Thinks 1664

Molly Worthen: “Charisma is not something that leaders have; it’s something that they do. Charisma is a kind of storytelling. It’s an ability to invite followers into a transcendent narrative about what their lives mean.”

FT: “Large language models gravitate towards the statistical consensus. A model trained before Galileo would have parroted a geocentric universe; fed 19th-century texts it would have proved human flight impossible before the Wright brothers succeeded. A recent Nature review found that while LLMs lightened routine scientific chores, the decisive leaps of insight still belonged to humans. Even Demis Hassabis, whose team at Google DeepMind produced AlphaFold — a model that can predict the shape of a protein and is arguably AI’s most celebrated scientific feat so far — admits that achieving genuine artificial general intelligence systems that can match or surpass humans across the full spectrum of cognitive tasks may require “several more innovations”. In the interim, AI primarily boosts efficiency rather than creativity.”

SaaStr: “We’re living through the biggest private equity hangover in history. PE firms are sitting on a record 29,000 companies worth $3.6 trillion—and half of these have been collecting dust on their books for five years or more. For SaaS founders, this isn’t just market noise. It’s a fundamental shift that’s reshaping how deals get done, how companies get valued, and what it takes to build an exit-worthy business.”

NYTimes: “[AI’s] ability to read and summarize text is already making it a useful tool for scholarship. How will it change the stories we tell about the past?…It is perhaps the most brain-breaking vision of A.I. history, in which an intelligent agent helps you write a book about the past and then stays attached to that book into the indefinite future, forever helping your audience to interpret it. From the perspective of human knowledge, is that utopia or dystopia? Who’s to say?”

NeoMarketing: The ONLY Path to Systematic, Sustainable, Profitable Growth (Part 2)

Marketing’s MI

Today, marketing faces its own “mission impossible” moment—one that has trapped businesses in an unsustainable paradox:

CMOs deliver Growth. CFOs demand Profits. CEOs want both.

This trifecta of expectations sounds reasonable—until you try to meet it. Traditional marketing, with its deep roots in volume-based outreach and acquisition-led strategies, simply cannot reconcile the push for rapid growth with the pull of profit discipline. Business leaders experience this every day: scaling revenue requires ever-increasing marketing spend but rising spend eats into margins. And so, the faster you grow, the more your profits shrink. The more you focus on efficiency, the more growth suffers.

This is not just a budgeting problem. It’s not a matter of tweaking media mix models, refining attribution, or finding the next campaign innovation. It’s a structural failure—a product of how modern marketing systems have evolved in the digital age.

The problem starts with the addiction to acquisition. Marketers are incentivised to chase new customers, often at any cost. Digital ad platforms, with their opaque auctions and rising CPMs, have become essential gatekeepers. Every time a customer clicks, converts, or comes back, brands pay a toll—to Google, Meta, Amazon, or other marketplaces. These platform “revenue taxes” can consume 20–30% of total revenue, especially in B2C and eCommerce businesses.

Even worse, much of this spend is reacquisition—targeting customers the brand already knows, who’ve already bought before. Instead of deepening the relationship through owned channels, brands are paying again and again to re-win attention they once had. It’s a leaky bucket strategy—AdWaste—disguised as growth.

Meanwhile, martech stacks are bloated and underutilised. While companies invest in powerful automation tools and customer data platforms, most only use a fraction of their capabilities. The complexity overwhelms teams, integration takes forever, and the dream of personalisation remains just that—a dream. Campaigns are still built for segments, not individuals. Messages are generic, not contextual. Journeys are broken across channels. The result? Customers tune out. Attention fades. Churn accelerates.

And so the cycle continues: acquisition compensates for poor retention, new spend covers up old inefficiencies, and marketing becomes a black hole of investment with diminishing returns.

This is why the tension between growth and profit feels unresolvable—why it seems like marketing’s own “mission impossible.” It’s not for lack of effort. It’s because the tools, metrics, and mindsets are misaligned with the outcomes business leaders truly want.

But what if that wasn’t the case? What if marketing could be reimagined—not as a cost centre or chaotic collection of campaigns, but as a systematic engine of profitable growth?

That’s the shift we need. That’s the opportunity ahead.

Thinks 1663

Business Standard: “Apple in China – The Capture of the World’s Greatest Company has been written by Patrick McGee, a Financial Times journalist based in San Francisco and responsible for covering Apple. The book tells two intersecting stories. First, how Apple moved from being just days away from bankruptcy in 1996 to becoming the most valuable company in the world within a span of 15 years. Second, it traces the contribution Apple has made to transforming China from a third-world, low-skill manufacturing base into the world’s largest and most sophisticated manufacturing location — a hub for advanced manufacturing.”

FT: “Politics may be downstream of culture, but culture is downstream of technology: and it is not clear how British democracy will be able to thrive without that shared sense of reality and culture, created in the last century, in part, by a shared media…Fragmentation of both our entertainment and our news harms societies as well.”

WSJ reviews The Triumph of Economic Freedom: “A common theme throughout the book is the extent to which government intervention has either made situations worse during crises or impeded economic progress in other periods. Policymakers, meanwhile, have repeatedly exacerbated matters by misdiagnosing the problems confronting them or by doubling down on failed policies.”

McKinsey: “Media businesses, creators, marketers, and brands have tracked this high-stakes competition for consumer attention but often equate it to a contest for consumption, comparing box scores of hours watched or eyeballs reached. This focus on the quantity of time spent—or the size of audience—overlooks a more important issue: the quality of time spent. Not all consumer attention is created equal. Consumption and monetization vary widely across 20 major mediums in the attention economy, and differing levels of attention are a key reason for that variability. New McKinsey research suggests that the media business has been missing the full story on consumer attention. Backed by an in-depth survey of 7,000 consumers worldwide—including 3,000 in the United States, which form the basis for this report—we have developed an “attention equation” that reveals the full drivers of attention value.1 Attention doesn’t simply equal the amount of time spent; it equals the amount of valuable time spent, driven by focus and intent.”