WSJ reviewing “How Big Things Get Done”: “Mr. Bent Flyvbjerg identifies two common flaws in developing large-scale projects: inadequate planning and prolonged execution. Managers and politicians have a bias for action, he says, often treating planning as an annoyance that must be endured before the real work begins. Imposing tight deadlines for completion may end up adding costs and time, because the easiest way to craft a tighter schedule is to short-circuit the planning process. Rushed planning can result in problems that crop up later, generating delays that push up the cost. Thorough planning, in Mr. Flyvbjerg’s view, should be followed by quick execution: The biggest source of risk, he says, is low-probability events—black swans—that occur after the start of construction or implementation. This is the time when a pandemic, a burst of inflation, a labor dispute or a natural disaster can delay even the best plans and upend cost estimates. The way to mitigate the risk, he says, is to “think slow, act fast,” investigating the project carefully on the front end but then, following the decision to proceed, moving full speed ahead.”
Richard Fulmer: “The rule, “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need,” creates incentives to demonstrate minimum ability and maximum need. Poverty is the inevitable result.” [via CafeHayek]
Burton Malkiel (of Random Walk fame): “My view is that the case for passive is stronger than ever. More than half of fund assets are in index funds, and the reason for the success is that the evidence just gets stronger and stronger that index investing is not mediocre investing, it is above-average investing. I’ve done empirical work over the course of 50 years, and SPIVA [the S&P Indices Versus Active scorecard] has done work showing that over the past 20 years about two-thirds of active managers are beaten by the index, and the rough third of active managers that win in one year aren’t the same ones that win in the next year. Compound that over 10 years, SPIVA finds that 90% of US active funds underperform their benchmark index.”
WSJ reviews “Outsmart Your Brain”: “Memory retrieval feels hard at first, like failing to do a pushup. But that’s precisely why it works. You must build new muscle…Mr. Willingham counsels that although rereading notes and books are among the most common strategies for studying—they quickly render the material familiar and therefore feel productive—they are among the least effective. Better to prepare study questions and try to answer them. Memory retrieval feels hard and useless at first, like trying and failing to do a push-up, but that’s precisely why it works. You must build new muscle…From the chapter on staying focused: We all know the advice to work in quiet locations and silence our phones, yet some of us still try to multitask or quickly answer texts in the middle of a thought. We underestimate how long it takes to get back on track after switching attention from one thing to another.”
Economist: “Advertisers pay handsomely for access to Google’s users, not least because they are typically only charged when someone actually visits their website. The revenue of Google’s parent company, now called Alphabet, has grown at an average annual rate of over 20% since 2011. In that period it has generated more than $300bn in cash after operating expenses, the bulk of it from search. Its market value has more than trebled, to $1.4trn, making it the world’s fourth-most-valuable public company. Unlike Apple and Microsoft, its bigger middle-aged tech rivals, it has not felt the need to reinvent itself. Until now.”

