WSJ: “Fusion has long been seen as a clean-energy alternative to sources that burn fossil fuels and release greenhouse gases. Other technologies and applications being developed in the race for fusion power include powerful magnets, better lasers or radiation therapy for cancer research. Developers mostly in the U.S., Canada and Europe have been riding a wave of momentum since August 2021, when scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory came close to achieving more energy in a fusion reaction than was put in with lasers, a goal known as net gain. Many grew to believe that a breakthrough was imminent. It came in December when the national lab achieved net gain for the first time.”
NYTimes: “In a study published [recently] in the journal Emotion, researchers found that people who habitually judge negative feelings — such as sadness, fear and anger — as bad or inappropriate have more anxiety and depression symptoms and feel less satisfied with their lives than people who generally perceive their negative emotions in a positive or neutral light. The findings add to a growing body of research that indicates people fare better when they accept their unpleasant emotions as appropriate and healthy, rather than try to fight or suppress them. “Many of us have this implicit belief that emotions themselves are bad, they’re going to do something bad to us,” said Iris Mauss, a social psychologist who studies emotions at the University of California, Berkeley, and a co-author of the new study. But most of the time, she said, “emotions don’t do harmful things.” “It’s actually the judgment that causes, ultimately, the suffering.””
Shankkar Aiyar: “The persistent puzzle is the sub-par participation rates of working-age persons. Nearly four out of ten working-age males and three of four females are staying out. The big question is can India combine the scale of its market and working age cohort to propel consumption, investment and growth. It is true the evolution of the gig economy and investment in infrastructure has triggered downstream effects. It is equally true that 42 per cent of India’s labour force depends on agriculture which accounts for a sixth of the national income. This fault line between urban and rural India distinguishes India’s potential and its reality. It could be argued that if China could leverage its demographics why can’t India? History may well rhyme but the conditions vary. China invested in health and education. It boasts of a literacy rate of 95 plus per cent. China crossed the literacy rate of 78 per cent in 1990 – India is still at 77 per cent. The new economy calls for better schooling and skills — the average Indian spends barely 6.3 years in schooling whereas the average Chinese worker has spent about 8.4 years and an American 13 years in schooling.”
Debashis Basu writes about India: “To become prosperous (forget about becoming an economic superpower) and achieve lower income inequality, strong economic growth is essential but not adequate. That growth needs to be sustained for a long time, supported by low inflation and low interest rates. This is possible only when the economy can adapt to shocks, which in turn is possible only through responsive rules, systems, and strong institutions. Otherwise, growth will stall and a majority of the people will not benefit from the sporadic high growth periods. …Only an economy that can quickly respond to higher demand by keeping inflation and interest rates moderate, while ensuring continued growth, will slowly succeed in spreading prosperity and reducing income inequality all around. This calls for highly adaptive and responsive institutions and regulatory systems. For example, in a boom, there will be a higher demand for hotel rooms. Can hoteliers add to the supply quickly enough? Not with scores of state and central permits that take years to be cleared. It is the same for every industry. Unfortunately, no government has done much to make our regulations fair and transparent, and our institutions accountable. Their actions have been quite the opposite — arbitrary, unfair, and unaccountable. Corruption is endemic. As long as all this remains, income inequality will keep widening and taxing the rich will fetch nothing; only votes.”

