McKinsey advice to CIOs and CTOs on Generative AI: “Move quickly to determine the company’s posture for the adoption of generative AI, and develop practical communications to, and appropriate access for, employees. Reimagine the business and identify use cases that build value through improved productivity, growth, and new business models. Develop a “financial AI” (FinAI) capability that can estimate the true costs and returns of generative AI. Reimagine the technology function, and focus on quickly building generative AI capabilities in software development, accelerating technical debt reduction, and dramatically reducing manual effort in IT operations. Take advantage of existing services or adapt open-source generative AI models to develop proprietary capabilities (building and operating your own generative AI models can cost tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, at least in the near term). Upgrade your enterprise technology architecture to integrate and manage generative AI models and orchestrate how they operate with each other and existing AI and machine learning (ML) models, applications, and data sources.”
Dr. Rina Bliss: “Up until the early 2000s, we believed that genetics predicted our intelligence and our IQ. We thought that genetics was telling us everything and that it could actually predict how well we would do on a particular test. Science since then has advanced greatly. We’re lucky to have research now that shows us that what genetics gives us is our brain architecture, our basic brain architecture, like the structures of our brain. And it doesn’t give us the quality of our thinking, the quality of our thoughts. It doesn’t tell us where we’re going to end up. Also, neuroscience has taught us that our brains are plastic; we are neuroplastic. That means we can change, and we do change. We are inherently developing and growing all the time, not just in our early childhood, but throughout our lives.”
Marc Andreessen: “The interesting thing about a system like GPT-4 is it has both: I would say, it has roughly human equivalent IQ–fluid intelligence–roughly of about 130, 135. And, I can tell you why I think we know that. But, then of course, which is sort of analogous to a quite smart person. It’s probably analogous to the IQ level of basically your typical student at the university where you are. However, it has, of course, far superior crystallized intelligence to any human, because it’s a computer. The other thing that’s happening is it just knows about so many more things, and that doesn’t translate into a higher level of fluid intelligence. But, when you use it, boy, is it useful because it turns out it knows a lot about everything in a way that any individual person does not. And so, basically, as a user of this, you get this kind of turbo-boost. You get its fluid intelligence augmenting your own, but you also get its crystallized intelligence and its entire memory augmenting yours. I think it’s the combination of those two things that give it such immediate practical payoff.”
NYTimes: “The hush at the end of the musical performance. The pause in a dramatic speech. The muted moment when you turn off the car. What is it that we hear when we hear nothing at all? Are we detecting silence? Or are we just hearing nothing and interpreting that absence as silence? The “Sound of Silence” is a philosophical question that made for one of Simon & Garfunkel’s most enduring songs, but it’s also a subject that can be tested by psychologists. In a paper published…in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers used a series of sonic illusions to show that people perceive silences much as they hear sounds. While the study offers no insight into how our brains might be processing silence, the results suggest that people perceive silence as its own type of “sound,” not just as a gap between noises.”

